Murs

[Jake2]

Nah, he's still immature sadly.

[Pk Theory]

hell no.

I think he's a total prick.

[D2~]

He's active and he puts forth the effort, something that can't be said for some people voting no on him.

 

Sure he flames but who doesn't around here? Half the time the flame is in retaliation anyways. (Not saying that's exactly justifiable but I can understand where he's coming from.)

 

I'd hate to see him declined after all the work he's put in, a minor attitude adjustment is something that can be dealt with down the road..no reason to send him packing because of it.

[chris]

Don't like him in general.

[Daniela]

 

I'd hate to see him declined after all the work he's put in, a minor attitude adjustment is something that can be dealt with down the road..no reason to send him packing because of it.

 

exactly, probably one unbiased person making him aware of when hes getting out of line and that its not exactly gonna make his time here easier would probably be enough. hes young and immature but weve all been there and hes a good member other than that so itd suck to decline him for something that can probably be fixed easily

[Nick]

I've rethought it, ye if he's willing to shut the fuck up once in a while

[niagro]

yes.

[erik]

Not ready yet, another round of FA

[Kripz]

Yeah hes a good guy

[Billgodyz]

I voted yes, I don't see him post on the forums much though

[h0z]

Because hes "annoying" is not a good enough reason for him to get declined, so unless you give an actual reason its not getting counted.

 

He is a good member and your personal issues against him shouldn't matter

[Ludadogg0]

No, he tries to be funny then when you retaliate he cries.

Not RoT material.

Edited November 26, 2010 by Ludadogg0

[Splodge]

I don't think he deserves to be declined a second time round. I've changed my vote to a yes.

[Bloodarrow42]

Attended today's fight this early in the morning, along with the other group of people who did so. Props to him for that.

[Breaker]

yes